K2 Reckoner 92 vs 102 vs 110: Three 2027 Widths, Spec by Spec
By Luke Judge · Published October 22, 2026
Key facts
- Reckoner 92, Reckoner 102 and Reckoner 110 are published at 92mm, 102mm and 110mm underfoot
- Reckoner 92 and 102 list a rocker-camber-rocker profile; Reckoner 110 lists a rocker profile
- Flex is published as 5 (Reckoner 92), 7 (Reckoner 102) and 5 (Reckoner 110) on snowsift.com's 1 to 10 scale
- The three are anchored at different lengths (149, 163 and 170cm), so weight and radius are not like-for-like
- None of the three displays an MSRP on snowsift.com
- Size-varying specs are anchored to each ski's shortest published length
This article compares three of the 2027 K2 Reckoner widths: the Reckoner 92 at 92mm, the Reckoner 102 at 102mm and the Reckoner 110 at 110mm underfoot. The pages are labelled Men's; separate women's pages exist for each width and are not covered here. snowsift.com also shows a Reckoner 124 (124mm waist) and a Reckoner KF for 2027; neither is compared here, and the KF page displays no waist width. The three differ on width, profile, flex and length run, and because each is anchored at a different length, weight and radius cannot be lined up directly.
The three skis, side by side
| Spec | Reckoner 92 | Reckoner 102 | Reckoner 110 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Waist (at anchor length) | 92mm | 102mm | 110mm |
| Tip / tail width | 124 / 114mm | 134 / 127mm | 138 / 135mm |
| Sidecut radius | 19.5m | 17.7m | 22m |
| Weight (per ski) | 1,817g | 2,040g | 2,140g |
| Anchor length | 149cm | 163cm | 170cm |
| Profile | Rocker / Camber / Rocker | Rocker / Camber / Rocker | Rocker |
| Flex (1 to 10) | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Core | Aspen | Aspen | Aspen |
| Construction | Cap | Triaxial Braid, Carbon | Triaxial Braid, Carbon |
| Lengths | 149, 159, 169, 179cm | 163, 170, 177, 184, 191cm | 170, 177, 184, 191cm |
| MSRP | Not published | Not published | Not published |
| Season | 2027 | 2027 | 2027 |
Specs are as published by the manufacturer. Tip width, tail width, radius and weight vary with length, so each is shown at that ski's shortest published length (the anchor row). Waist is quoted at the same anchor lengths; most skis hold their waist across lengths, but some widen it by 1 to 2mm at longer lengths, so only gaps of 4mm or more are treated as real differences.
What the sheets say
Width steps up clearly. The Reckoner 92 to 102 step is 10mm and the 102 to 110 step is 8mm. Both are well above 4mm, so the order holds even though the three are anchored at different lengths.
Weight and radius cannot be lined up. The anchors are 149cm, 163cm and 170cm, so the 1,817g, 2,040g and 2,140g per-ski figures, and the 19.5m, 17.7m and 22m radii, are each at a different length. snowsift.com shows these specs only at each ski's shortest published length, and we do not rank the skis on them.
Profile and flex differ. The Reckoner 92 and 102 list a rocker-camber-rocker profile; the Reckoner 110 lists a rocker profile. Flex is published as 5 for the 92, 7 for the 102 and 5 for the 110.
Construction is listed, not explained. All three list an aspen core. The 92 lists cap construction; the 102 and 110 list Triaxial Braid and Carbon. We report the names as published and make no claim about how the skis ski.
The length runs differ. The 92 runs 149 to 179cm, the 102 runs 163 to 191cm and the 110 runs 170 to 191cm, with no length shorter than 170cm on the 110. See how to choose ski length for sizing.
Price is blank. None of the three has an MSRP displayed on snowsift.com. We show that as not published rather than guess.
Summary
- Waist: 92mm, 102mm and 110mm.
- Anchor lengths: 149cm, 163cm and 170cm, so weight and radius are not like-for-like.
- Profile: rocker-camber-rocker on the 92 and 102; rocker on the 110.
- Flex: 5, 7 and 5.
- MSRP: not displayed for any of them.
Every figure on this page comes from the manufacturer's own page for the 2027 ski. A value is shown only when two separate reads of that page agree, and the verification record for each product is on its page. Here is how we match products and verify specs. For what weight and radius do and don't tell you, see ski weight numbers and ski turn radius explained.
Frequently asked questions
- What is the difference between the K2 Reckoner 92, 102 and 110?
- Width is the clearest published difference: 92mm, 102mm and 110mm underfoot, each at that ski's shortest published length. The Reckoner 92 and 102 list a rocker-camber-rocker profile and the Reckoner 110 lists a rocker profile. Flex is published as 5, 7 and 5. Radius and weight are anchored at 149cm, 163cm and 170cm respectively, so they are not directly comparable.
- Which is the widest Reckoner, the 92, 102 or 110?
- The Reckoner 110, at 110mm underfoot at its shortest length (170cm). The Reckoner 102 is 102mm (163cm) and the Reckoner 92 is 92mm (149cm). Each step is 8mm or more, larger than the 1 to 2mm some skis widen at longer lengths, so the order is real.
- Which Reckoner is lightest, the 92, 102 or 110?
- The published per-ski figures are 1,817g (Reckoner 92, 149cm), 2,040g (Reckoner 102, 163cm) and 2,140g (Reckoner 110, 170cm). Each is at a different length, so they are not like-for-like and snowsift.com does not rank them.
- Do the Reckoner 92, 102 and 110 come in the same lengths?
- No. The Reckoner 92 is published in 149, 159, 169 and 179cm. The Reckoner 102 is published in 163, 170, 177, 184 and 191cm. The Reckoner 110 is published in 170, 177, 184 and 191cm.
SnowSift is independent: we cross-check every spec against the manufacturer source and rank retailers by price, never by commission. How we match products & verify specs.